Re:Paradox-free time travel is theoretically possible
by suby on Wednesday January 20, 2021 @11:50PM
(#25855541)
I find the concept absurd as well. If you do something like go back in time and murder Hitler, you're going to be impacting the actions of every single human being alive. Within a few generations there's going to be an entirely different set of people alive than the set of people alive in the universe in which Hitler was not murdered. This idea that you would still have to go back in time because the universe corrects itself makes no sense because there's just no way you would still exist. I'd be willing to entertain the idea that someone else would go back in time for the same reason, but it's all just wild speculation.
Re:Paradox-free time travel is theoretically possible
by throwanem on Thursday January 21, 2021 @12:02AM
(#25855617)
Pratchett: “Shoot the dictator and prevent the war? But the dictator is merely the tip of the whole festering boil of social pus from which dictators emerge; shoot him and there'll be another one along in a minute. Shoot him too? Why not shoot everyone and invade Poland?”
Re:Paradox-free time travel is theoretically possible
by quickthrower2 on Wednesday January 20, 2021 @11:58PM
(#25855594)
Perhaps it’s the paradox that makes the travel
impossible rather than the physics with the infinite loops settling/converging on the scenario where time travel is not discovered / possible.
But the article reads like some sci-fi bs tbh. What's considered the 'same outcome'. If I kill baby Hitler, would the universe create another just like him? Or someone else will do same things? If someone else does them, surely it won't (for example) kill as much people. So someone dead would now be alive in the future (or vice versa). And now the outcome isn't the same yeah?
Sorry but this is bs.