Re:Again on 0-based vs. 1-based indexing
by naniwaduni on Wednesday January 20, 2021 @02:46PM
(#25851028)
Notably, this requires you to use a signed index type, which is absurd.
The alternative is to use the so-called goes-to operator: for (i=N; i --> 0;). But this actually relies on the postincrement semantics, which is a huge wart.
The alternative is to use the so-called goes-to operator: for (i=N; i --> 0;). But this actually relies on the postincrement semantics, which is a huge wart.