Re:Order on Protecting Americans from Overcriminalization Th...
by AnthonyMouse on Tuesday January 19, 2021 @12:40AM
(#25830381)
The laws that were both actually enforced and reasonable basically were. I don't think we need to emulate things people historically said they would do even though they didn't, or did do but were unreasonable.
Re:Order on Protecting Americans from Overcriminalization Th...
by bawolff on Tuesday January 19, 2021 @12:52AM
(#25830457)
That seems circular to me. Surely most people follow the laws that seem reasonable to them. If everyone agreed on what was reasonable behaviour, we wouldn't need laws.
Re:Order on Protecting Americans from Overcriminalization Th...
by AnthonyMouse on Tuesday January 19, 2021 @12:55AM
(#25830474)
Basically everybody knows that murder is wrong but some people still do it.
Re:Order on Protecting Americans from Overcriminalization Th...
by bawolff on Tuesday January 19, 2021 @01:11AM
(#25830547)
People do try and argue its justified in specific circumstances. Sometimes people have an over-active imagination for what constitutes self-defense.
Hell, trump pardoned someone convicted of murder (which is disgusting, but i guess he thought it was reasonable).
But my main point is there was never a time or society where the only crime was murder.
Not saying it is perfect or imperfect. Just saying the imagined time when all rules were self-obvious natural laws that could be logically deduced a priori, never existed.