News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I wasted $40k on a fantastic startup idea by rel2thr on Monday January 18, 2021 @04:19PM (#25826756)
I like your idea, but I’m confused why you didn’t try the webmd competitor route.. 50c/user that webmd makes is pretty good really , with good SEO + content marketing you could scale to enough users to make things interesting
Re:I wasted $40k on a fantastic startup idea by sixQuarks on Monday January 18, 2021 @04:37PM (#25826955)
Exactly. This was the right path in this case. The value is for the consumer, if he could attract just 100K visitors per month, that's $500,000/year.

Not only that, he would have a highly targeted group of users that he could tailor all kinds of products and services to.

Re:I wasted $40k on a fantastic startup idea by ivalm on Monday January 18, 2021 @04:56PM (#25827149)
You need 1mil visitors for 500k.
Re:I wasted $40k on a fantastic startup idea by saaaaaam on Monday January 18, 2021 @05:04PM (#25827220)
Indeed. Which what 100k per month comes to, give or take :)
Re:I wasted $40k on a fantastic startup idea by yaboy on Monday January 18, 2021 @05:15PM (#25827324)
You’re both wrong. 100k visitors per month ≠ 100k unique users per month. Very different things!
Re:I wasted $40k on a fantastic startup idea by sixQuarks on Monday January 18, 2021 @07:57PM (#25828707)
You're being super nit-picky. It should have been assumed 100K "visitors" meant uniques, but I knew someone like you might make this comment. 100K * 12 = 1,200,000 visitors. I added a 20% margin to account for return visitors.
Re:I wasted $40k on a fantastic startup idea by yaboy on Monday January 18, 2021 @08:43PM (#25829002)
I’d like to see you tell your founder or CMO that the difference between monthly visitors and monthly unique visitors is “super nit-picky”.

The 20% margin is risible and those who live by SEO die by SEO: https://cdixon.org/2011/03/05/seo-is-no-longer-a-viable-mark...

Re:I wasted $40k on a fantastic startup idea by saaaaaam on Tuesday January 19, 2021 @02:33PM (#25837745)
Well, quite! But then I pretty much assumed it was a shorthand amongst peers so (over) explanation perhaps wasn’t really necessary...