I can't think of a clearcut example that would show barring someone from your private platform is an expression of your First Amendment protected rights. I'd assume it would qualify under whatever property right gives a business the right to refuse customers, but I'm unsure if that's a constitutionally protected right and what it is based on.

There might be enough uncertainty to at least not get the law immediately overturned, but I'm no expert.

> I'd assume it would qualify under whatever property right gives a business the right to refuse customers

So the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which restricted that right, would be a precedent from different protected classes.

What is your opinion on Net Neutrality? Certain interests always get exemptions.

Great, so I can refuse to bake a cake for a gay wedding?

Probably, but I wonder whether you could ask facebook to take down messages on your facebook page to bake a cake for a gay wedding if a North Dakotan legislator was requesting it...

I agree with OP as well with hosting rights so I don't see why not. Otherwise it's a kind of enforced slavery. People shouldn't have to do work for people they refuse to do work for. Force a man to do such a thing and his will for civility can take a dive.

> Great, so I can refuse to bake a cake for a gay wedding?

That’s already the case for the USA. You can also create religious organizations and ban gay people from employment there.

According to the US Supreme Court, yes.

Yep. You’re not under obligation to bake a cake for anyone that asks for you to, paid or unpaid.