News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Many scientists citing two scandalous Covid-19 papers ign... by eisstrom on Saturday January 16, 2021 @12:51PM (#25803861)
I just checked the twitter account of the first author (who does not seem to be currently affiliated with any scientific institution). I can only understand his German and English tweets. He likes to push his own book, retweeted a post claiming "just stop testing for the virus and people will die of influenza again", and calls other peoples work pseudoscience.
Re:Many scientists citing two scandalous Covid-19 papers ign... by mhkool on Saturday January 16, 2021 @12:59PM (#25803925)
Why don't you talk about the 10 points that the scientists state to argue that the test is flawed? And what do you have to say about the other 21 scientists? What do you have to say about the former Pfizer chief scientist which is co-author?
Re:Many scientists citing two scandalous Covid-19 papers ign... by morsch on Saturday January 16, 2021 @01:13PM (#25804042)
Here's a fairly exhaustive rebuttal: https://mobile.twitter.com/BMauschen/status/1333466298072911...

I'll leave the translation up to the readers.

That former Pfizer guy apparently claimed in October that the coronavirus pandemic is “effectively over” in the United Kingdom. Clearly a man with special insights.

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/dec/02/blog-posti...

Re:Many scientists citing two scandalous Covid-19 papers ign... by gus_massa on Saturday January 16, 2021 @01:45PM (#25804310)
Autotranlation for the lazy: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=auto&tl=en&u=h...

(For the lazier, the technical discussion starts at the 12th tweet.)