Re:Are Experts Real?
by rusticpenn on Monday January 11, 2021 @12:32PM
(#25732411)
Regardless of the quality of knowledge, people with better social and networking skills will become better known than those without.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Are Experts Real?
by TheTrotters on Monday January 11, 2021 @12:51PM
(#25732758)
Among the general public? Definitely.
Social and networking skills also matter within your professional community but they are not a substitute for publishing in top journals/conferences.
Re:Are Experts Real?
by rusticpenn on Monday January 11, 2021 @10:09PM
(#25741763)
Perhaps your experience is different. Having the right name as the first or last author helps a lot in peer review and publication. Even in “double blind” reviews, it’s easy to find the authors usually.
Sort of true, but not quite. You may infer that a paper is from a certain lab or that the first author may be someone specific as it builds on their work... But last author? Not as easy as supervisors/lab leads can change.
Re:Are Experts Real?
by rusticpenn on Wednesday January 13, 2021 @04:23AM
(#25759896)
Its not the supervisors who become famous. Its the lead Professor of the lab. Usually in engineering papers/journals the first/last author is the lead professor of the lab, who does nothing more than get the funding for the project.