Re:The Most Backdoor-Looking Bug I’ve Ever Seen
by ryanlol on Monday January 11, 2021 @08:21AM
(#25728515)
>but apparently there's still a way for Facebook to give FBI et. al. un-encrypted chats, no?
I’d love to see a source for this.
Re:The Most Backdoor-Looking Bug I’ve Ever Seen
by pdimitar on Monday January 11, 2021 @08:25AM
(#25728543)
Me too, but after Snowden I doubt we'd be able to even if it were true.
Re:The Most Backdoor-Looking Bug I’ve Ever Seen
by ryanlol on Monday January 11, 2021 @08:33AM
(#25728627)
I don’t get it, this claim should be fairly easy to prove by reverse engineering the app.
Re:The Most Backdoor-Looking Bug I’ve Ever Seen
by pdimitar on Monday January 11, 2021 @03:02PM
(#25735595)
Then why has nobody done it? F.ex. Google's Project Zero?
Re:The Most Backdoor-Looking Bug I’ve Ever Seen
by pvg on Monday January 11, 2021 @03:40PM
(#25736369)
You mean, why has nobody found WhatsApp is actually not E2E encrypted? Could it be it's because it's actually E2E encrypted? Your evidence to the contrary is no evidence at all and now you're asking why p0 hasn't found evidence of your position either. It's a very odd line of argument.
I don't dispute this but apparently there's still a way for Facebook to give FBI et. al. un-encrypted chats, no? So is that truly encrypted?
> I think your (perfectly understandable) misinterpretation was corrected in a rather polite manner, but you still wanted to argue after being corrected by multiple native english speakers.
Yes and no. Being a native speaker doesn't excuse ambiguity and idiomatic expressions. I believe people who write in English on the internet have a duty to avoid idioms as much as possible. I am not a native speaker and easily misrepresented the meaning.
But, even the author corrected me so, okay.
As for polite... let's agree to disagree there. You are questioning my opinion that I get snarky replies but IMO it's clearly visible that no small amount of replies weren't made in good faith and were only aimed to express hurtful sarcasm.