Re:The Most Backdoor-Looking Bug I’ve Ever Seen
by lifthrasiir on Monday January 11, 2021 @07:32AM
(#25728046)
There is another reason that might be valuable for cryptographers though: MitM might mean either {man,monster,machine,monkey}-in-the-middle (interception and manipulation unbeknownst to both parties) or meet-in-the-middle (space-time tradeoff for nested encyption schemes). AFAIK there is no other well-known suitable term for the latter, unlike the former.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
[dead]
Re:The Most Backdoor-Looking Bug I’ve Ever Seen
by lifthrasiir on Monday January 11, 2021 @09:23AM
(#25729134)
Are you sure? I'm not a cryptogrpher and I think neither are you while Filippo Valsorda is indeed a serious cryptographer. And yes, I copied that list from Wikipedia because people is genuinely trying to replace the word without altering the abbreviation.
Re:The Most Backdoor-Looking Bug I’ve Ever Seen
by baobabKoodaa on Monday January 11, 2021 @11:04AM
(#25730737)
> people is genuinely trying to replace the word without altering the abbreviation
What? It's changed from "MITM" to "PITM". The first letter of the abbreviation is altered.
Re:The Most Backdoor-Looking Bug I’ve Ever Seen
by lifthrasiir on Monday January 11, 2021 @11:37AM
(#25731360)
"That" list refers to {man,monster,machine,monkey}. Any three alternatives equally work for me. But cryptographers may have other concerns.