Re:Foundations of Embedded Systems
by user-the-name on Sunday January 10, 2021 @04:26PM
(#25720073)
I would go for the GBA, which has a much more comfortable processor, and some very nice graphics hardware. It really hits a sweet spot for capability vs. constrainedness.
Re:Foundations of Embedded Systems
by molticrystal on Sunday January 10, 2021 @04:50PM
(#25720356)
Or you could go from an even more fundamental level with a simple course https://www.nand2tetris.org/
You build up a computer from simulated logic gates, constructing the ALU, CPU, Ram, I/O etc. The opcodes are comparable to those in the CPUs you mentioned, but you have the added benefit of the magic that occurs when it is able to process those opcodes. The best part is, thanks to the courses exceptional guidance and streamlining, it only takes about half a day or so to get it to that point.
After that you can follow the rest of the course to making a compiler, etc. Or you could move to an NES emulator as you mentioned. The nand2tetris halfway mark would also be a good jumping point for the principles, compiler, and RISC equipment mentioned in the OP's course.
I once designed a microcoded bit slice processor on paper. It's useful because it's conceptually simple enough to get in your head. And there isn't anything software related that really can't be mapped to it. Or an extension of it.
Re:Foundations of Embedded Systems
by ibeckermayer on Monday January 11, 2021 @03:01AM
(#25726046)
I've been working on a project off and on where I'm implementing the processor described in that course on an FPGA. Most of the digital design is done at this point: https://github.com/ibeckermayer/Nand2TetrisFPGA
I admit this may have had the effect on me because the NES had a special place in my childhood.