News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Foundations of Embedded Systems by sircastor on Sunday January 10, 2021 @02:52PM (#25718894)
This is a bit of a side step to the article, but I recommend anyone who wants to really learn low level programming try to write a simple piece of software for the NES. The 6502 is well known, how the NES operates is likewise well known. Is not easy by any means, but I found it to be very rewarding and instructional to how computers work. Alternatively, following Ben Eater’s 6502 computer videos is likewise instructional.

I admit this may have had the effect on me because the NES had a special place in my childhood.

Re:Foundations of Embedded Systems by user-the-name on Sunday January 10, 2021 @04:26PM (#25720073)
I would go for the GBA, which has a much more comfortable processor, and some very nice graphics hardware. It really hits a sweet spot for capability vs. constrainedness.
Re:Foundations of Embedded Systems by molticrystal on Sunday January 10, 2021 @04:50PM (#25720356)
Or you could go from an even more fundamental level with a simple course https://www.nand2tetris.org/

You build up a computer from simulated logic gates, constructing the ALU, CPU, Ram, I/O etc. The opcodes are comparable to those in the CPUs you mentioned, but you have the added benefit of the magic that occurs when it is able to process those opcodes. The best part is, thanks to the courses exceptional guidance and streamlining, it only takes about half a day or so to get it to that point.

After that you can follow the rest of the course to making a compiler, etc. Or you could move to an NES emulator as you mentioned. The nand2tetris halfway mark would also be a good jumping point for the principles, compiler, and RISC equipment mentioned in the OP's course.

Re:Foundations of Embedded Systems by Gibbon1 on Sunday January 10, 2021 @06:45PM (#25721764)
I once designed a microcoded bit slice processor on paper. It's useful because it's conceptually simple enough to get in your head. And there isn't anything software related that really can't be mapped to it. Or an extension of it.
Re:Foundations of Embedded Systems by ibeckermayer on Monday January 11, 2021 @03:01AM (#25726046)
I've been working on a project off and on where I'm implementing the processor described in that course on an FPGA. Most of the digital design is done at this point: https://github.com/ibeckermayer/Nand2TetrisFPGA
Re:Foundations of Embedded Systems by miguelrochefort on Sunday January 10, 2021 @06:44PM (#25721759)
I never cared about low-level programming, until I got my hands on the PineTime/Colmi P8 smart watch. With just 64KB of RAM and 514KB of Flash memory, you can't avoid it.

In just a few days, I learned a lot about:

- Memory allocation

- Image encoding

- Bluetooth

- Drivers

I recommend it to anyone interested in learning embedded systems programming.

Re:Foundations of Embedded Systems by iamcreasy on Tuesday January 12, 2021 @01:37AM (#25743206)
Very interesting. The dev kit is also very cheap. Did you learn those things through official documentation? or some other source?
Re:Foundations of Embedded Systems by RMPR on Sunday January 10, 2021 @01:50PM (#25718044)
This is actually pretty great. I was looking for a way to dip my toes into low level stuff. After skimming a bit it seems very focused on hardware though. Out of curiosity how does it compare to https://jaycarlson.net/embedded-linux/ ?
Re:Foundations of Embedded Systems by jimmyswimmy on Sunday January 10, 2021 @02:00PM (#25718187)
Most of what embedded is, is hardware. To build the low level software and drivers requires a detailed understanding of the hardware and its datasheets. It would be pretty hard to give a generic overview of the software side these days, because there is just so much out there. I mean you have the TI parts for the beagle bone which have a pair of microcontrollers on them each having access to the same memory as the main processor. There's the video processor on Broadcoms chip in the raspberry pi. Understanding any of the details of these components requires understanding most of thousands of pages of documentation. Most people wait for someone else to do it for them!

In the old days the only peripherals were timers and ADCs. You could make a generic and useful tutorial for those. Not anymore!

Re:Foundations of Embedded Systems by diydsp on Sunday January 10, 2021 @04:10PM (#25719886)
After a few decades in the biz I'm seeing things change. Almost all drivers these days are written. Embedded is more about integration. It's also interconnected with many web-based tools and operating systems.
Re:Foundations of Embedded Systems by m-ee on Sunday January 10, 2021 @05:06PM (#25720549)
I wish all drivers were written. Aside from things like arduino/pyboard the choice in my experience has been using some massively bloated questionably tested vendor code or just going to the data sheet and writing it yourself.
Re:Foundations of Embedded Systems by markus_zhang on Sunday January 10, 2021 @10:11PM (#25723905)
Just curious, is it possible to be good at digital circuit without studying analog circuit?

I figured by skipping AC I might miss a huge part of the picture.

Re:Foundations of Embedded Systems by dbuder on Sunday January 10, 2021 @11:20PM (#25724458)
Everything is analog, your rise time, your standing waves, your sensors and everything has parasitics. My rule of thumb is that anytime you tell yourself you will avoid learning something in electronics you will eventually have to learn it. That said, you can get a very long way by knowing almost nothing at all beyond high school science and playing lego, and I'm not talking about arduino at all. Need an Analog Front End? Take one from a reference design, take their code while you are at it. Want to know what is messing with your circuit? Learn and understand Maxwell's equations, or put it on a scope and google about. If you want to get products manufactured there is a lot to learn but if you do normal well understood things you don't need to be brilliant or talented.
Re:Foundations of Embedded Systems by tedfernau on Monday January 11, 2021 @01:31AM (#25725403)
I wouldn’t say Maxwells equations are necessary to accomplish almost anything in embedded systems, or even in most of electrical engineering.
Re:Foundations of Embedded Systems by markus_zhang on Monday January 11, 2021 @04:59PM (#25737930)
Thanks, I got the idea. So basically the deeper you go the more fundamental you have to go back, right?

I'm also considering a bottom up method that starts from (re)learning circuits from high school physics classes. Back then, IIRC we also used breadboard and I very much enjoyed the experiment part of the course.

Plus it might help the kid in the future.

Re:Foundations of Embedded Systems by petee on Sunday January 10, 2021 @02:27PM (#25718598)
Check out "Introductory Microcontroller Programming" by Peter Alley (to be clear, not me.) for Wocester Polytech; I came across this by accident the other day -

[pdf] https://web.wpi.edu/Pubs/ETD/Available/etd-042811-095908/unr...

Over the period of being the TA for these courses multiple times, I learned a great deal, but also noticed several recurring issues the students seemed to face. In addition to furthering my own knowledge on the care and feeding of microcontrollers, this thesis is an attempt to provide students with a resource to overcome some of their difficulties, to provide a better understanding of the hardware level operation of a microcontroller, and as instruction into improving their knowledge and code.

edit: in addition, for really low level hardware, check out Ben Eater's series on YouTube building a breadboard 6502

Re:Foundations of Embedded Systems by contingencies on Sunday January 10, 2021 @07:58PM (#25722709)
Re:Foundations of Embedded Systems by hvasilev on Sunday January 10, 2021 @03:43PM (#25719531)
Why are so many videos not available until November 2021?
Re:Foundations of Embedded Systems by ldx1024 on Sunday January 10, 2021 @04:21PM (#25720021)
Upcoming events. They are not doing the livestream until then.