News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:CTO day 2: downsizing the team by jacquesm on Sunday January 10, 2021 @08:19AM (#25714401)
Such refusal is a sign of maturity in an MT member. Taking a stand to protect your department from unrealistic requests is part and parcel of being a responsible person to begin with, at the management level it starts to make the difference between a company that will continue to function and one that will be dysfunctional soon - if it isn't already.

The complete lack of empathy on display here is proof positive for me that this person does not have what it takes to be a successful manager.

I've just taken my company through a 50% drop in revenues and we've survived, stronger than ever, not a single person got laid off and all our bills are paid. That didn't happen because I treat my co-workers, partners and employees as replaceable cogs and if I would give my second in command the order to get rid of 50% of our workforce I would expect some serious pushback on that. Not that I would ever do that.

Re:CTO day 2: downsizing the team by mytailorisrich on Sunday January 10, 2021 @09:00AM (#25714669)
You're making a different point.

If you don't agree with a course of action then by all means do make your point in a constructive way.

But once the decision is made then you cannot shun your responsibility and refuse to implement it. Either "disagree and commit" to the best of you ability or quit.

Re:CTO day 2: downsizing the team by jacquesm on Sunday January 10, 2021 @09:10AM (#25714746)
You can disagree with a course of action and still implement it in a way that won't gut the company. This isn't that. But let's give it six months, assuming they'll make it that far.