Re:Amazon, Apple and Google Cut Off Parler
by jaredsohn on Sunday January 10, 2021 @12:12AM
(#25710545)
Parler should have known this was a risk going in. Being able to switch cloud providers is important if there is potential for controversy for your service.
Re:Amazon, Apple and Google Cut Off Parler
by mullingitover on Sunday January 10, 2021 @12:28AM
(#25710708)
From what Corey Quinn is saying, they have to be doing something really, really bad to get kicked off AWS, and no other host would abide it. Self-hosting wouldn't help them either, since their ISP could just yank the plug for the same reasons.
For reference, AWS hosts The National Enquirer, which threatened to leak, er, extremely sensitive photos of Jeff Bezos.
Re:Amazon, Apple and Google Cut Off Parler
by Merman_Mike on Sunday January 10, 2021 @02:02AM
(#25711707)
> For reference, AWS hosts The National Enquirer, which threatened to leak, er, extremely sensitive photos of Jeff Bezos.
Described by someone as a "below the belt selfie".
Re:Amazon, Apple and Google Cut Off Parler
by dmourati on Sunday January 10, 2021 @12:13AM
(#25710552)
Not really. There is a difference between multicloud and cloud agnostic.
Re:Amazon, Apple and Google Cut Off Parler
by mesozoic on Sunday January 10, 2021 @07:41PM
(#25722482)
At this point you should definitely go multicloud and I will have to present that point to my company or I would be derelict in duties.
[dead]
Re:Amazon, Apple and Google Cut Off Parler
by lumpenprole on Sunday January 10, 2021 @12:17AM
(#25710600)
Yes! They could get Peter Thiel back on board. It would be like old times.
[dead]
[dead]
We've banned this account for trolling. Please don't create accounts to break HN's guidelines with.
Edit: I would recommend Corey Quinn's thread for more background, but tl;dr it's hard to get kicked off AWS and it's not happening due to political slant
https://twitter.com/QuinnyPig/status/1348130385411018752