Re:Ray Tracing in pure CMake
by lasagnaphil on Saturday January 09, 2021 @08:38AM
(#25700226)
Oh no... so far the most terrifying title I've seen in HN this year. By the way, it's impressive how they even managed to multithread this.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Someone might be working on an article even worse: list of things that raytracers haven't been written in (yet, regularly updated)
MySQL raytracer: http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=83222
Or how about: an LLVM backend for CMake.
Calm down Satan.
You calm down, we haven't even brought in WebAssembly yet!
Next thing you know someone will suggest HN with hierarchy for repeated and unrelenting topics. Linux ports on home appliances, ray tracing, vi vs. emacs, launchd vs systemd, walled gardens, .... Oh no, say it isn't so!
Those darn Hackers on hackernews! :)
Re:Ray Tracing in pure CMake
by master_yoda_1 on Saturday January 09, 2021 @02:22PM
(#25703624)
Hackers works on things which are not trivial.so certainly not a hacker
Darn those non-hackers who don’t work on non-trivial things! :)
Re:Ray Tracing in pure CMake
by master_yoda_1 on Sunday January 10, 2021 @09:34PM
(#25723621)
those are called software engineers :)
(PS: would that eventually count as "raytracers, written in provocative blog post meme"?)
To pick from a recent HN thread: A raytracer has probably not been written yet using only printf. Who wants the glory?
Maybe that'll be my next project. Or instead someone should just write a compiler which outputs a printf format string, perhaps?
There are even Excel ray tracers out there
In fact that’s not even difficult, given how both a raytracer and a spreadsheet are basically functions that assign a value to every cell of a grid.
Well, if you can store data in icmp packets, I bet you can do math, too.
When someone manages to write a raytracer in COBOL I will be truly impressed.