Re:Permanent suspension of @realDonaldTrump
by picardythird on Friday January 08, 2021 @10:49PM
(#25696595)
I’m not defending race rioting. But the context of the riots that occurred over race and the riot that occurred where a mob was two doorways away from killing members of congress is contextually important, as is the fact that the capital rioters answered to exactly one (1) person. And the fact that that one person who had the power to call in the national guard to prevent such deaths appeared uninterested in doing so.
Re:Permanent suspension of @realDonaldTrump
by thefucnjosh on Friday January 08, 2021 @07:47PM
(#25693670)
Yeah their hesitation shouldn't have happened.
They shouldn't have issued those weird corrections to his statements either, they would have had MORE credibility had they come down sooner by actually assigning someone to give the public legitimate reasons for them to ban him.
Re:Permanent suspension of @realDonaldTrump
by throwaway316943 on Saturday January 09, 2021 @06:49AM
(#25699616)
You’re missing the point. If Twitter had a spine and was actually acting in good faith in accordance with their rules they would have issued a ban years ago. They would have done a lot of other things too so this is purely a hypothetical. They waited until after confirmation of the election and strong evidence that the powers that be are now firmly on their side before lifting a finger.
Angry groups of protesters and resulting deaths are not a thing that started happening this week. Twitter are pathetic and have taken a stand once the writing was on the wall.