News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:An Update on SolarWinds by vorpalhex on Friday January 08, 2021 @11:50AM (#25686610)
> Our IDEs are standalone tools and bear no relation to TeamCity, other than the fact that we use our own installation of TeamCity to build them.

It sort of seems like a compromised CI pipeline would allow an attacker to do all kinds of interesting things to your distributed binaries...

Re:An Update on SolarWinds by swsieber on Friday January 08, 2021 @11:58AM (#25686709)
True, but it wasn't JetBrains's CI pipeline that was compromised.
Re:An Update on SolarWinds by colonelpopcorn on Friday January 08, 2021 @01:59PM (#25688561)
But if they have a vulnerability that SolarWinds has not yet disclosed, they could very well be distributing compromised software.
Re:An Update on SolarWinds by foolmeonce on Friday January 08, 2021 @03:37PM (#25690116)
Everything has a vulnerability that Solarwinds hasn't disclosed. What is the logic in focusing on this extremely unique choice? A plan by a government wants to spearfish developers at every enterprise software company to find 1+ ways in to their clients and should have chosen something universal. Without any apparent data, it seems more likely the suspicion is just speculation because it is less common than email clients, legacy browsers, dev-servers, common libraries, etc.

I.e. because no one else found this intruder the crap software that everyone uses must be safe?

Re:An Update on SolarWinds by sudhirj on Friday January 08, 2021 @02:13PM (#25688804)
Yes, but that’s a big if. It’s also simply possible that Solarwinds has their TeamCity admin account password set to ‘password’ and accessible on a public network.
Re:An Update on SolarWinds by zinekeller on Friday January 08, 2021 @04:29PM (#25690760)
... actually, SolarWinds used "solarwinds123" on their FTP site.

Which is stored on a publicly-accessible GitHub repository.

(Source: https://www.theregister.com/2020/12/16/solarwinds_github_pas...)

Re:An Update on SolarWinds by vorpalhex on Friday January 08, 2021 @02:48PM (#25689382)
Right, and we don't know, which means we should audit aggressively and assume these things may still be open attack vectors. You don't hang out with the backdoor open waiting for your friend to let you know.
Re:An Update on SolarWinds by marcosdumay on Friday January 08, 2021 @03:07PM (#25689698)
I guess that's why they said that they are auditing aggressively their CI tool.
Re:An Update on SolarWinds by sudhirj on Friday January 08, 2021 @09:51PM (#25695804)
We should, but we should have assumed CI software was an attack vector since before the solar winds hack. It’s always been a vector. This hack doesn’t change anything.