Re:Kingdom: Sikkim’s merger with India
by nashashmi on Tuesday January 05, 2021 @07:44PM
(#25653423)
I had read on Wikipedia that Sikkim was annexed due to it being a failed state. This article stating that it was conquered like Tibet is an eye opener. And one I want to doubt.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Kingdom: Sikkim’s merger with India
by mangamadaiyan on Wednesday January 06, 2021 @01:45AM
(#25655223)
Not for nothing that Satyajit Ray's "Sikkim" was (still is?) banned.
Re:Kingdom: Sikkim’s merger with India
by thunderbong on Wednesday January 06, 2021 @02:39AM
(#25655466)
Thanks. Didn't know about this film. The ban was lifted in 2010.
Re:Kingdom: Sikkim’s merger with India
by saagarjha on Wednesday January 06, 2021 @04:01AM
(#25655907)
> Censorship
> This section is empty. You can help by adding to it. (December 2018)
If this isn't irony, I don't know what is…
Re:Kingdom: Sikkim’s merger with India
by magnusmundus on Wednesday January 06, 2021 @05:12AM
(#25656302)
The next sentence states it was banned again after two months.
> In November 2010 [...] received an injunction from the court of Sikkim again banning the film.
Re:Kingdom: Sikkim’s merger with India
by thunderbong on Wednesday January 06, 2021 @05:39AM
(#25656447)
Missed that somehow. Available on Youtube in India however -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWe067r5X-s
Also, having now watched the whole film, I couldn't quite fathom why it was banned in the first place!
Re:Kingdom: Sikkim’s merger with India
by mangamadaiyan on Wednesday January 06, 2021 @09:00AM
(#25657761)
Apocryphally, for two diametrically opposite reasons - one, for showing that poverty existed in Sikkim, and two, for showcasing pre-annexation Sikkim as a "nice place". All the preceding is hearsay, anyway!