> We recognize that work involving generative models has the potential for significant, broad societal impacts
The community did raise up to the challenge of re-implementing it (sometimes better) in the past, so I'm hopeful.
Delaying release is to give others (most clearly social media) time to adjust and ensure safety within their own platforms/institutions (of which they are the arbiters). It also gives researchers and entrepreneurs a strong motivation of "we have to solve these risk points before this technology starts being used". While there are clearly incentive issues and gatekeeping in the research/startup community, this is a form of decentralized decision-making.
I don't see a strong case for why access should be open-sourced at announcement time, especially if it's reproducible. Issues will arise when their tech reaches billions of dollars to train, making it impossible to reproduce for 99.99% of labs/users. At that point, OpenAI will have sole ownership and discretion over their tech, which is an extremely dangerous world. GPT-3 is the first omen of this.
EDIT: I'm assuming you mean for inference, for training it would be an other kind of challenge and the answer would be a clear no