Re:After spending $57M on Facebook ads, I was kicked off
by LordAtlas on Tuesday January 05, 2021 @12:11AM
(#25642355)
What is objectionable about that post? The OP said "Facebook decided they don't want to be a part of this type of content distribution" as if they were privy to some business decision that was not public knowledge. The reply simply asked them to substantiate it. I do not see any hostility in it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:After spending $57M on Facebook ads, I was kicked off
by dang on Tuesday January 05, 2021 @05:31PM
(#25652127)
To me the second paragraph reads like a classic internet cross-examination, barraging someone with questions in order to back them into admitting some misdeed. I can see how it could be read otherwise.
Re:After spending $57M on Facebook ads, I was kicked off
by dvtrn on Tuesday January 05, 2021 @11:37PM
(#25654707)
I can see how it could be read otherwise
Isn’t in the HN guidelines to “respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize”?