Re:Uber discovered they’d been defrauded out of 2/3 of their...
by disgruntledphd2 on Monday January 04, 2021 @10:30AM
(#25632526)
Yup, this is the problem. There is no centralised log of what people bought, which is what you'd need to actually fix this problem.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Uber discovered they’d been defrauded out of 2/3 of their...
by joshspankit on Monday January 04, 2021 @11:27AM
(#25633481)
A good argument, but it happens on Amazon when the search, research, and purchase were all on Amazon.
Re:Uber discovered they’d been defrauded out of 2/3 of their...
by rchaud on Monday January 04, 2021 @12:39PM
(#25634936)
Yup, I get "buy it again" prompts on nearly all of my recent purchases, even when they are all durable goods that don't expire or require restocking, like say a tablet case.
Re:Uber discovered they’d been defrauded out of 2/3 of their...
by disgruntledphd2 on Tuesday January 05, 2021 @09:56AM
(#25646138)
Hmmm, that's really weird. It's probably an edge case that would be complicated to change in that case (never underestimate the power of inertia, especially in ML systems).
Re:Uber discovered they’d been defrauded out of 2/3 of their...
by joshspankit on Tuesday January 05, 2021 @10:30AM
(#25646510)
I feel like it might be almost trivially solved with a “buyer only needs one [for X months/years?]” property on the items.
It would likely have to be added by a human, but still: there are a relatively small number of items that people only need one of.