Re:Uber discovered they’d been defrauded out of 2/3 of their...
by disgruntledphd2 on Tuesday January 05, 2021 @09:56AM
(#25646138)
Hmmm, that's really weird. It's probably an edge case that would be complicated to change in that case (never underestimate the power of inertia, especially in ML systems).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Uber discovered they’d been defrauded out of 2/3 of their...
by joshspankit on Tuesday January 05, 2021 @10:30AM
(#25646510)
I feel like it might be almost trivially solved with a “buyer only needs one [for X months/years?]” property on the items.
It would likely have to be added by a human, but still: there are a relatively small number of items that people only need one of.