News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Pentagon Puts F-35 Full-Rate Production Decision on Hold by toomuchtodo on Saturday January 02, 2021 @08:19PM (#25618429)
Isn’t a Global Hawk, Triton, or similar with high altitude loiter capabilities and StarLink support not a more pragmatic option for such a role? They’re also unmanned. If carrier support is required, there’s the X-47B/X-47C vehicle.

Platforms should go high and slow (but faster when necessary, when in range of bad times). Ordinance should go fast, very fast, with no people onboard.

Re:Pentagon Puts F-35 Full-Rate Production Decision on Hold by dodobirdlord on Sunday January 03, 2021 @04:17AM (#25620659)
UAVs like the Global Hawk or Triton aren't large enough to be fast enough to be useful against enemy fighters. As for StarLink, all relevant LEO satellites are coming down in the early stages of any open combat between the US and a near-peer adversary. To contest air superiority requires a platform that goes very fast and can see very far. To fight enemy fighters or to strike ground targets in places without air superiority a stealth fighter large enough to be fast and to carry a long-range sensing and jamming suite is needed.
Re:Pentagon Puts F-35 Full-Rate Production Decision on Hold by toomuchtodo on Monday January 04, 2021 @12:41PM (#25634964)
My point is that fighters are obsolete. Sensor platforms get you the target, long range ordinance kills the target. Dog fights are dead like the SR71, which was obsoleted by orbital surveillance. See from afar, kill from afar, and stop trying to put a human onboard.