News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Conspiracy Theory Handbook by jeffreyrogers on Saturday January 02, 2021 @02:14PM (#25615491)
Conspiracy theories thrive when true information is suppressed for political purposes. If you want to stamp out conspiracies stop lying to people about things they obviously know are false and they will be more willing to believe you when there is more uncertainty.
Re:The Conspiracy Theory Handbook by bambataa on Saturday January 02, 2021 @02:20PM (#25615539)
What makes you confident that is the reason? Are all people equipped to work out what is obviously false?

It is one thing to be distrustful of official sources and another to believe that Bill Gates is injecting nano particles into vegetables based on a video you saw on YouTube.

Re:The Conspiracy Theory Handbook by jeffreyrogers on Saturday January 02, 2021 @02:50PM (#25615822)
People don't just start believing Bill Gates is injecting nano particles though. They get there through a gradual process.

Edit: And I am confident this is the reason because I have observed people go down this process. People who are intelligent, and not the caricatures they are made out to be.

Re:The Conspiracy Theory Handbook by bambataa on Sunday January 03, 2021 @05:29AM (#25620929)
Could you describe the overall process you have seen people go down?
Re:The Conspiracy Theory Handbook by krapp on Saturday January 02, 2021 @05:33PM (#25617236)
You're right - the Bill Gates injecting nano-particles into COVID vaccine has its basis in several pre-existing conspiracy theories, such as anti-vaxx, fears of RFID/"Mark of the Beast" tagging, Satanic/ritualistic activities by elites (see: Bohemian Grove, Skull and Bones, etc.) which themselves are derived from (albeit not always directly indicative of) anti-Semitic conspiracies.

Even with QAnon, the pieces were already there among the right-wing and extremist Christianity, they were just assembled into a single, somewhat coherent narrative.

Re:The Conspiracy Theory Handbook by brobdingnagians on Saturday January 02, 2021 @02:41PM (#25615730)
This. When information is suppressed, people fill in the gaps. Some people do it with wilder and wilder ideas, but there _is_ a gap, and those who think the information suppression is totally benign are naive, considering both historical precedent and the obvious question of, "what are they hiding that they don't want people to know about?" If it was benign, a government by the people and for the people would be transparent to the people. Lack of transparency hints that it is neither by nor for the benefit of the people.
Re:The Conspiracy Theory Handbook by dhbsbd636 on Saturday January 02, 2021 @03:28PM (#25616176)
No conspiracy theories thrive when the truth nuanced and complex, and takes more than two sentences to explain.

For example, rare and unforeseeable side effects from vaccines. They exist. Information is not being suppressed. However, the risk-benefit calculation from both a personal and societal standpoint is just complex and muddy enough to be exploited by some snake oil salesman hawking nutritional supplements that boost “natural immunity”.