dhbsbd636

Maybe I inhabit a different world from others, but this was not a conspiracy theory - at least if you had at least one friend from mainland China.

However, I think that people were right to push back against strong claims about a novel virus. At the time it was unclear whether this was another SARS or MERS, not quite as bad, or something worse. We didn’t even know for sure whether it bound ACE2 or DPP4 before mid February.

Hindsight is 2020 and I am very skeptical of anybody who claims they knew anything about the SARS-CoV-2 virus with any degree of certainty back in January.

No conspiracy theories thrive when the truth nuanced and complex, and takes more than two sentences to explain.

For example, rare and unforeseeable side effects from vaccines. They exist. Information is not being suppressed. However, the risk-benefit calculation from both a personal and societal standpoint is just complex and muddy enough to be exploited by some snake oil salesman hawking nutritional supplements that boost “natural immunity”.

Did they claim there was some grand conspiracy? Or that they were being opposed by an oil industry funded lobby?

Interest and advocacy groups exist and make no secret of their agendas. Do these pass for conspiracies now?

I wouldn’t call that a kernel of truth so much as having a tenuous connection to some pre existing collective schema.

Companies lobby the government to get laws passed that positively impact their bottom line. However I would not consider this some kernel of truth supporting the theory that “big seatbelt” is trying to take away your freedom, and seatbelt laws are part of a boiling the frog approach to turn the US into a totalitarian state.

Another class of BS “conspiracy” theories are simply contested political issues. Here the wacko conspiracy part usually comes into play as some erroneous motive ascribed to one of the parties.