Re:California law bans delivery apps from listing a restaura...
by cleak on Friday January 01, 2021 @11:10AM
(#25604225)
I’m confused. How is GrubHub getting a 30% commission out of restaurants that don’t actively partner with them?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:California law bans delivery apps from listing a restaura...
by jiofih on Friday January 01, 2021 @02:42PM
(#25606112)
They only do this ruse for a while, then after controlling a good chunk of the business they “sell” their services officially to the restaurant, including commission. It’s not a charity.
Re:California law bans delivery apps from listing a restaura...
by cleak on Friday January 01, 2021 @03:20PM
(#25606600)
But it's up to the individual restaurants to agree to this. There's no automatic 30% commission. If a delivery company wants to burn their capital offering discounts, why stop them? The restaurant is under no obligation to sign a contract taking on the burden of kreping those discounts.
Re:California law bans delivery apps from listing a restaura...
by jiofih on Friday January 01, 2021 @04:29PM
(#25607376)
Very naive view. They will be “strongly incentivized” to sign once the company can threaten to pull their listing off and vanish 50% of their customer base. Nothing new here, standard growth playbook.
Re:California law bans delivery apps from listing a restaura...
by splaytreemap on Saturday January 02, 2021 @12:13AM
(#25610576)
So then why would California force them into that very situation?
Re:California law bans delivery apps from listing a restaura...
by MaintenanceMode on Friday January 01, 2021 @08:52PM
(#25609451)
It's not just about the money. The menus, information, and other details are just wrong or go out-of-date because this pizza restaurant changes things on a daily basis. Additionally their business is not setup for take-out at scale. They do the occasional take-out but when the phone starts ringing with to-go orders they were not anticipating, they are not staffed or ready to meet the demand. They call to remove themselves and then a few weeks later they end up back on there.
Re:California law bans delivery apps from listing a restaura...
by nirushiv on Friday January 01, 2021 @11:23AM
(#25604314)
I think they mean that other partnered restaurants get 30%. I could be misreading it though.
Re:California law bans delivery apps from listing a restaura...
by CydeWeys on Friday January 01, 2021 @12:43PM
(#25604970)
They inflate menu prices and add additional service and delivery fees. You end up spending $50 on a meal that should be $30, and if you were shopping by amount of money spent (as many people are) then the net result is $30 going to the restaurant instead of all $50 you were willing to spend.
Re:California law bans delivery apps from listing a restaura...
by cleak on Friday January 01, 2021 @01:10PM
(#25605212)
Sure, but that’s not actually a commission from the restaurant. The restaurant earns the same amount regardless of if it was true takeout or GrubHub (for folks that haven’t opted in to being partners).
Re:California law bans delivery apps from listing a restaura...
by listenallyall on Friday January 01, 2021 @01:22PM
(#25605319)
sorry but at some point it's on the customer. if they are so price-insensitive that they are willing to pay $50 for $30 of food, they are too lazy to cross-reference the price, or shop around, or just go pick it up themselves, then I have no issue with the delivery service milking them for whatever the customer is willing to spend.