Re:Why London’s NYE Fireworks Display Broke Economics Textbooks
by Swenrekcah on Thursday December 31, 2020 @02:11PM
(#25595999)
The article uses the term.
If there is a star in the sky and I see it, I don’t consume it so that you can see it too.
But if I occupy a spot, I “consume” that so you can’t be there simultaneously.
So there is rivalry if we both want to be there.
Re:Why London’s NYE Fireworks Display Broke Economics Textbooks
by chrisseaton on Thursday December 31, 2020 @02:13PM
(#25596018)
Yes but 'in non-rivalrous' doesn't make any sense.
Re:Why London’s NYE Fireworks Display Broke Economics Textbooks
by whoisburbansky on Thursday December 31, 2020 @02:17PM
(#25596066)
It took coming down to your comment to realize that GP had “in non-rivalrous,” I’d just glossed it over and assumed it said “is”
Re:Why London’s NYE Fireworks Display Broke Economics Textbooks
by smorephism on Thursday December 31, 2020 @02:08PM
(#25595956)
Being in a place can be thought of as a rivalrous good because other people cannot simultaneously be in that place.
Re:Why London’s NYE Fireworks Display Broke Economics Textbooks
by jamespwilliams on Thursday December 31, 2020 @02:08PM
(#25595948)
s/in/is
Neither does your comment! What do you mean 'in non-rivalrous, but being somewhere is'?