Re:Hospital employee fired for ‘intentionally’ ruining 500 d...
by rwdim on Thursday December 31, 2020 @11:08AM
(#25593907)
seriously people, quit posting paywalled content.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Hospital employee fired for ‘intentionally’ ruining 500 d...
by hombre_fatal on Thursday December 31, 2020 @11:40AM
(#25594216)
No. I don't only want to read ad-driven content. Time to learn how to bypass paywalls in 2020.
Re:Hospital employee fired for ‘intentionally’ ruining 500 d...
by skeeter2020 on Thursday December 31, 2020 @11:56AM
(#25594390)
so... you don't want to pay for content or get ads. Enjoy your cake.
Re:Hospital employee fired for ‘intentionally’ ruining 500 d...
by fingerlocks on Thursday December 31, 2020 @01:24PM
(#25595420)
You can bypass a paywall by paying.
That’s how I interpreted the post.
Re:Hospital employee fired for ‘intentionally’ ruining 500 d...
by NoOneNew on Thursday December 31, 2020 @11:44AM
(#25594238)
To be fair, doesn't bypassing paywalls kind of the defeat the purpose for these sites to be able to provide content without ads? Thus, ad driven content is the only way for them to keep the lights on.
Re:Hospital employee fired for ‘intentionally’ ruining 500 d...
by EdJiang on Thursday December 31, 2020 @12:12PM
(#25594574)
The WashPo paywall is the worst -- it rewrites your address bar so you can't even bookmark the URL for later or copy/paste it to share. Really frustrating on mobile when you can be in an app that's not logged into WashPo. Why would the product team make that decision?
Re:Hospital employee fired for ‘intentionally’ ruining 500 d...
by fencepost on Thursday December 31, 2020 @11:53AM
(#25594354)
Frequently bypassing is just searching for the title to pick it up at another news site that it's syndicated to.
Re:Hospital employee fired for ‘intentionally’ ruining 500 d...
by blendergeek on Thursday December 31, 2020 @11:59AM
(#25594435)
Paywall content is explicitly ok on Hacker News. From the FAQ [0]:
> Are paywalls ok?
> It's ok to post stories from sites with paywalls that have workarounds.
> In comments, it's ok to ask how to read an article and to help other users do so. But please don't post complaints about paywalls. Those are off topic. More here. [1]
Re:Hospital employee fired for ‘intentionally’ ruining 500 d...
by kergonath on Thursday December 31, 2020 @11:44AM
(#25594239)
That’s fine. The discussions here are most of the time more interesting than the articles anyway.
And there are ways around most paywalls if one article is particularly interesting.
Re:Hospital employee fired for ‘intentionally’ ruining 500 d...
by loopz on Thursday December 31, 2020 @11:49AM
(#25594300)
No, we already got /. for that.
Re:Hospital employee fired for ‘intentionally’ ruining 500 d...
by kergonath on Thursday December 31, 2020 @05:18PM
(#25597827)
Not really comparable. Slashdot’s fine for flame wars but much less interesting than HN. Narrower in scope as well.
Re:Hospital employee fired for ‘intentionally’ ruining 500 d...
by Exmoor on Thursday December 31, 2020 @11:34AM
(#25594160)
It would've taken about the same amount of time to find and link a non-paywalled article, and been much more useful.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/12/31/wiscon...
Re:Hospital employee fired for ‘intentionally’ ruining 500 d...
by newdude116 on Thursday December 31, 2020 @11:56AM
(#25594383)
Dunno. My "bypass paywalls clean" Browser-add on does wonders.
Re:Hospital employee fired for ‘intentionally’ ruining 500 d...
by pomian on Thursday December 31, 2020 @11:39AM
(#25594198)
Can read it fine within hn app(Android - manual maly)
Re:Hospital employee fired for ‘intentionally’ ruining 500 d...
by fxtentacle on Thursday December 31, 2020 @11:17AM
(#25593983)
While I agree, there would be very little left otherwise.