Re:Uber will charge significantly more per trip as new Seatt...
by astrea on Wednesday December 30, 2020 @10:54PM
(#25589413)
Assuming that your narrative is factual, is it Uber's obligation to subsidize the government's infrastructure failings?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Uber will charge significantly more per trip as new Seatt...
by neuromanser on Thursday December 31, 2020 @01:00AM
(#25590027)
(Not the parent poster.) I believe this question needs to be answered first: is society obligated to subsidize Uber? I believe the answer is "no". Uber is not owed any profit. A life-sustaining income does not have to be in the form of food stamps. A law prescribing life-sustaining wages is a government's infrastructure.
Re:Uber will charge significantly more per trip as new Seatt...
by astrea on Thursday December 31, 2020 @11:46AM
(#25594263)
They aren't obligated to subsidize Uber. However, they are within their right to set their own prices.
Re:Uber will charge significantly more per trip as new Seatt...
by throwaway201103 on Thursday December 31, 2020 @02:18AM
(#25590379)
Uber doesn't owe society its existence or jobs either. If they shut down, who's paying the life-sustaining wages?
Re:Uber will charge significantly more per trip as new Seatt...
by oblio on Thursday December 31, 2020 @07:23AM
(#25592008)
Didn't society exist before Uber? I'm not sure.
Also, did Uber build the roads, bridges, parking lots? Did it research the internet? I also heard GPS was researched in a secret Uber lab...