News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Oxford-AstraZeneca coronavirus vaccine approved for use i... by vesinisa on Wednesday December 30, 2020 @05:06AM (#25580320)
Nope, that's what they kind of started saying after the herd immunity experiment failed. Back in May they were still happy to go on record to say that herd immunity was part of the Swedish strategy:

https://www.npr.org/2020/04/26/845211085/stockholm-expected-...

But by July antibody tests showed that herd immunity was still very far away. Tegnell has since claimed it was never their goal, which to me sounds like hand washing.

EDIT: As pointed, Swedish representatives later asked the article to state that herd immunity was not their goal after all - you could almost forgive the journalist for the confusion. Here is Tegnell instead strategizing in private about letting the virus spread in school children to hasten herd immunity:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/aug/17/swedens-covid-...

Re:Oxford-AstraZeneca coronavirus vaccine approved for use i... by cygx on Wednesday December 30, 2020 @05:15AM (#25580363)
But note the correction at the bottom of that page:

April 27, 2020

An earlier version of this story said the Swedish government is pursuing a strategy of "herd immunity." Swedish officials say their plan was to impose limited restrictions instead of a lockdown but have denied they were purposely pursuing a strategy of herd immunity.

Re:Oxford-AstraZeneca coronavirus vaccine approved for use i... by polack on Wednesday December 30, 2020 @05:23AM (#25580429)
Herd immunity is a potential side-effect of a virus hitting a population, it was never the strategy!

If you have a pandemic with a new virus it would be kind off incompetent of the epidemiologists to not try to calculate if the population will reach herd immunity or not. That does NOT mean that heard immunity is the goal.

So where is your source on herd immunity strategy? Or will you just keep on spreading lies?

EDIT: Off course Sweden, just as Finland admits, calculated and talked about herd immunity. But there is not a single shred of proof that they picked that as a strategy. Do you really think everyone at the FHM (health agency) colluded on doing this behind the backs of the population and then they all keep it a secret? Why? What would there motives be?

Re:Oxford-AstraZeneca coronavirus vaccine approved for use i... by scoopertrooper on Wednesday December 30, 2020 @05:50AM (#25580597)
The Guardian article definitely gives the game away. I made a comment earlier featuring some of the more damning quotes from the architect of the Swedish strategy.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25580518