Because they claimed that elderly patients were sent to care homes. I guess you could argue this is "fact based" in that it's a distortion of the facts.

Because they argued that comparing Sweden to it's similar neighbour is "cherry picking", and yet cherry picked a much less suitable group - the whole of Europe - because it suited their argument.

Because they, without any facts, imply that Sweden's high death toll could be avoided by putting the elderly in hotels

Why is the first point a distortion of the facts?

You don't give a reason for why the whole of Europe is less suitable than it's immediate neighbours (geographic location is only a small part of the puzzle).

I didn't say the third one at all.

There're so many ways to lie with statistics.