News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Bitcoin Lottery by marssaxman on Tuesday May 17, 2011 @05:34PM (#2558014)
Sure. Certainly. But that is true of any currency. The novelty in bitcoin is that it enforces scarcity, and thus limits inflation, without depending on a central issuing agent.

Part of what it means to have confidence in a currency is to be reasonably sure that its inflation will be limited to a rate that allows you to exchange your currency tokens before they are drained of value. Passing the hot potato, etc. With a fiat currency that confidence is based on nothing more than your beliefs about the central issuing agent's likely future actions.

What's new with bitcoin is that there is no central authority who can decide what the inflation rate should be. The inflation rate is built into the mathematical definition of the currency, and it is self-limiting: the more work people put into mining bitcoins, the longer it takes to find new ones. This is not true of any existing currency, and is in fact an improvement on existing currencies.

Even if we don't all end up deciding to build an economy around bitcoin, this is an important achievement, something future currency designers ought to make note of.

Re:The Bitcoin Lottery by tzs on Tuesday May 17, 2011 @08:52PM (#2558624)
What's to stop some economically significant entity (like a government) from starting a new Bitcoin-like pool of coins, with different parameters? This would allow them to control the overall supply of digital currency.