News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google Maps changes a route after the drama of young peop... by paulmd on Wednesday December 30, 2020 @01:20AM (#25579124)
A very flippant "HN techbro libertarian" response. Pretty much everything that is not constitutionally protected as a right can be regulated, why would you possibly think that it couldn't?

Yes, you absolutely could lobby for someone to write a law requiring Google to respond to nuisance requests from their navigation services. That is basically what DMCA does, after all.

Hypothetical example law: OK, you have a good-faith presumption up until someone emails you a copy of a deed and proves it's their driveway, then you legally need to correct it within X days or penalties start to rack up.

Re:Google Maps changes a route after the drama of young peop... by abeppu on Wednesday December 30, 2020 @02:27AM (#25579437)
You've said that stuff which isn't constitutionally protected _can_ be regulated, but the question posed was _are_ maps regulated. Are they? What legal obligation to accuracy or comprehensiveness are map-makers bound by? And are maps constitutionally protected? If political donations are speech then maps certainly seem like speech.
Re:Google Maps changes a route after the drama of young peop... by fuzxi on Wednesday December 30, 2020 @01:32AM (#25579188)
Your response is unnecessarily aggressive. His questions are innocent.
Re:Google Maps changes a route after the drama of young peop... by flemhans on Wednesday December 30, 2020 @03:59AM (#25579944)
I agree. And it resorts to name-calling. What's a techbro, anyway.