News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:July 09, Tumblr Did 250 Million PgV. May 16, 2011: Tumblr... by kylelibra on Tuesday May 17, 2011 @03:37PM (#2557536)
At first glance I thought the title inferred that Tumblr hadn't increased in traffic in two years, which was very confusing. A better title would be something along the lines of "Tumblr now does as much traffic in one day as it used to do in one month."
Re:July 09, Tumblr Did 250 Million PgV. May 16, 2011: Tumblr... by trickjarrett on Tuesday May 17, 2011 @04:12PM (#2557696)
I had the same confusion, and the sentence which explains it was less than clear to me - I had to reread it to be clear on what it was saying.

That's damn impressive.

Re:July 09, Tumblr Did 250 Million PgV. May 16, 2011: Tumblr... by thelibrarian on Tuesday May 17, 2011 @07:46PM (#2558476)
I think if "09" was changed to "2009" it would be much clearer. Especially as the full year is already used for 2011 in the same headline.
Re:July 09, Tumblr Did 250 Million PgV. May 16, 2011: Tumblr... by scrame on Tuesday May 17, 2011 @10:17PM (#2558796)
Really bad title, were you trying to optimize it for twitter?

On the first read it sounded (to me) like nothing had changed, it wasn't until I actually clicked through and read the full headline that it made sense.

Re:July 09, Tumblr Did 250 Million PgV. May 16, 2011: Tumblr... by tudorizer on Tuesday May 17, 2011 @06:11PM (#2558144)
holy fucking wow. I knew that tumblr rocked, but not that much.