Re:Boeing 737 Max to Resume Flying U.S. Passengers Today
by tyingq on Tuesday December 29, 2020 @10:45AM
(#25570813)
I don't think anything changed. Is there some compelling evidence that it did?
Here's the a/c type on southwest.com desktop, right now: https://imgur.com/a/B6PxsbB
I don't see it on mobile, but I don't think it's ever been there.
Re:Boeing 737 Max to Resume Flying U.S. Passengers Today
by edoceo on Tuesday December 29, 2020 @09:52AM
(#25570217)
Or maybe it's just some designer fiddling with screen real-estate and negative space.
Re:Boeing 737 Max to Resume Flying U.S. Passengers Today
by nipponese on Tuesday December 29, 2020 @10:03AM
(#25570321)
Or maybe it was some engineer making the point that the data wasn’t accurate or reliable in the first place.
Re:Boeing 737 Max to Resume Flying U.S. Passengers Today
by edoceo on Tuesday December 29, 2020 @10:50AM
(#25570886)
What if both were true? And designers and engineers worked together to clean the UI from possibly wrong and noisy information in the results brief? Teamwork makes the dream-work.
Re:Boeing 737 Max to Resume Flying U.S. Passengers Today
by heavenlyblue on Tuesday December 29, 2020 @10:57AM
(#25570991)
The data was wrong all along but the management didn’t want to remove it until they finally realised that it’s creating a negative revenue pressure.
No matter if the vehicle is safe to fly or not, some people may not feel comfortable flying on one. The only justification of overturning 80+ years of airliner industry precedent in eliminating the specific vehicle type from the descriptions is to deceive.