Re:Tribes of Programming (2017)
by amirkdv on Monday December 28, 2020 @07:22PM
(#25565056)
I think what you describe is captured fairly well by the third "tribe":
> The way people in this camp describe themselves is fundamentally pragmatic. They write software because software is useful to other people [...] I think most professional software engineers are in this tribe
Fwiw, I don't think "tribe" is a good word for what the author describes. Maybe "attitude" or "principle" would be more fitting, albeit less catchy and intriguing.
Re:Tribes of Programming (2017)
by burlesonK on Tuesday December 29, 2020 @04:49AM
(#25568276)
I don't think what he described is captured at all by the third "tribe." He clearly does it for money and there should be a fourth "tribe" for that category. I agree with you that "tribe" is a poor choice here.
Re:Tribes of Programming (2017)
by betenoire on Monday December 28, 2020 @11:20PM
(#25566671)
I don't like the term tribe either. To me, these are biases. And biases can change or be context-sensitive. I find myself in 1 and/or 3 often depending on the work.
> The way people in this camp describe themselves is fundamentally pragmatic. They write software because software is useful to other people [...] I think most professional software engineers are in this tribe
Fwiw, I don't think "tribe" is a good word for what the author describes. Maybe "attitude" or "principle" would be more fitting, albeit less catchy and intriguing.