News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Life After Eroom’s Law by refoundable on Monday December 28, 2020 @02:02PM (#25562072)
It's worth noting that the most effectives breakthroughs against cancer in recent decades (Immunotherapy, angiogenesis-suppressing drugs) have largely been based on ideas that were first dismissed and widely ridiculed by senior scientists working on cancer research.

I suspect that in another 50 years, when the war against cancer is (finally) over, we will end up with a completely different perspective on the history of cancer research than the often self-serving and propagandized perspective we have today.

Re:Life After Eroom’s Law by MichaelZuo on Monday December 28, 2020 @02:40PM (#25562461)
Just how radical were these ideas you speak of from the accepted dogma?
Re:Life After Eroom’s Law by refoundable on Monday December 28, 2020 @03:03PM (#25562645)
On angiogenesis, see Judah Folkman: https://www.tobinproject.org/about/judah-folkman

On cancer immunotherapy, see Fran Visco's story as partially told by Daniel Sarewitz (section titled "War on Cancer"): https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/saving-science

Re:Life After Eroom’s Law by MichaelZuo on Monday December 28, 2020 @05:09PM (#25563823)
Thanks! They certainly like very illuminating insights. From my viewpoint epigenetics seems like the forerunner to many future revelations too.