We're in general interested in items that are built-to-last, not in being annoyed for each purchase on an annual basis. If you would like to make an impact in the "buy for life" arena, I suggest you carefully select your vendors to actually produce items that are worthy of that label. Quality builds a reputation over time via word of mouth, not via online reviews.
(This might still be a workable approach if you can give trusted reviewers a platform to highlight what they consider the best & most reliable, but you'll still need to vet those reviewers carefully)
It'd be interesting to collect reviews from established reviewers (rtings, Wirecutter, Consumer Reports, etc) and create an average score too.
e.g. clothing built with more sustainable and/or more performant materials may not be 'buy it for life', but to some may be a better item.
How do those get reviewed over time? For example I have a few different wool sweaters - my favorite one I've bought twice and yet falls apart more rapidly than others.
One example of this brought up is https://www.econtalk.org/elizabeth-pape-on-manufacturing-and... - where in the interview she states her clothing items aren't built to be 'for life'.
If you filter by those and still find that this product has a shorter lifespan than comparable products then idk.
On your about page you say:
>> Part of our solution is the automatic scraping and aggregation of data from all over the web. In addition, we are partnering with different organizations that provide us with verified sustainability data.
I don't understand how scraping the web is useful to you. Can you explain?
I also don't understand how partnering with orgs will provide you with verified sustainability data. What type of organizations are these?
>> We want to help you finding products and brand that reflect your values. That's why we collect a lot of information about a brand, i.e his manufacturing practices, certifications, warranty or repair service.
How do you suppose you'll match a user to a brand (or to a collection of brands)?
>> We are not in a position to assess such data, so we are partnering with different companies and standardisation bodies that assess sustainable production standards.
That sounds like a deliciously hard problem to solve. Are you hiring? Or are you looking for tech partners?
In the Uk I use Which? to get an idea of what’s good and what’s not.
Funnily enough on your homepage I saw the Miele vacuum that I have had for 12 years. Just yesterday I was marvelling at it as it wound up the cord flawlessly after all these years, 6 house moves and zero maintenance.
Have you ever been annoyed about an Amazon review saying "Package arrived flawless after one day, 5 stars"
Amazon doesn't allow that kind of review, I'm sure some slip by but they do have policy against this and enforce it.
Have you ever been annoyed about an Amazon review saying "Package arrived flawless after one day, 5 stars"?
I want to change the way people review products. I'm now introducing "Recurring Reviews". After every year, the reviewer will receive an automatic reminder to assess the condition of the product and if the reviewer is still happy with it. This is how we can follow the whole lifecycle of a product.