Re:California Public Utilities Commission fired director who...
by refurb on Sunday December 27, 2020 @07:25AM
(#25550569)
Yet democrats are taking back room bribes to approve new construction. Huh!
The regulation enables the corruption.
https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/san-francisco/sf-publi...
Re:California Public Utilities Commission fired director who...
by hnruss on Sunday December 27, 2020 @03:22PM
(#25553935)
I’d bet that the dollar amounts involved where appointed officials corruptly use regulation to solicit bribes in the U.S. is orders of magnitude smaller than the amounts involved in “campaign donations” to elected officials to prevent and remove regulations.
The amount in question in that article is $5,000.
For comparison, the amount in question here is $34,000:
https://theintercept.com/2020/10/12/alaska-republican-senato...
Re:California Public Utilities Commission fired director who...
by paulryanrogers on Sunday December 27, 2020 @09:40AM
(#25551315)
Would regulation with transparency be the best of both? Because it seems tax law changes so often and violating it so trivial I doubt it'd be better.
IMO those in charge should be forced to drink/breath from whichever area tested most polluted on a regular basis, and as a public event. Once they can no longer hide or pass on the consequences they should take the problems more seriously.
I don’t think that public-interest groups have as much money for backroom deals as multi-national corporations. So that’s why I’m pretty sure of it.