Re:Tokio 1.0 – async runtime for Rust
by octoberfranklin on Wednesday December 23, 2020 @09:33PM
(#25524551)
It bugs me that that library will spin up a scheduler without being asked to do so.
As I understand it, that difference (vs Tokio) was the main driver behind the projects splitting.
I also think it's a bit presumptuous for them to name themselves "std". It'll be even more ridiculous in the likely event that Tokio becomes the std:: asynchronous I/O library. It's asking for confusion.
As I understand it, that difference (vs Tokio) was the main driver behind the projects splitting.
I also think it's a bit presumptuous for them to name themselves "std". It'll be even more ridiculous in the likely event that Tokio becomes the std:: asynchronous I/O library. It's asking for confusion.