I am not saying that virus is artificial nor that is not dangerous. I am only saying that how it is being dealt with feels suspicious to me. I would love to be proven wrong as the time goes by. You know for example in some countries specific businesses are ordered to shut down, while others that operate more or less the same when it comes to people to people contact can remain open. Then you have a whole specific niches of economy left without help, but competing large big corporations connected to government get all the support (for example small IT consultancy businesses in my country don't get any help, but large consultancies do get it).

OK, I see your point. I guess I'm spoiled in that the government in my country is not very corrupt. Sure a little, but not very.

But we also have our fair share of disputes over what businesses can open, which have to close, etc. The problem is a very difficult one, so it's to be expected that there will be inconsistencies and some unfair treatment unfortunately.

In the best case the businesses that are forced to close get some help with payroll and such. Then again there is the problem of who gets help. You said small consultancies don't get help where you're from but big ones do. That sounds corrupt and so I can understand your viewpoint better.

Sometimes small businesses or individual operators don't get support because they have neglected proper taxes. They surely feel treated unfairly, but are they? It's a hard problem.

Note that I'm not saying that's the case with your example, I can totally see a corrupt government helping their lobbyist friends in this way.

Speaking of corporate interests, it seems I really spooked some readers by mentioning asset taxes.