Re:Jaywalking decriminalization, 100 years after the auto in...
by woodruffw on Monday December 21, 2020 @03:23PM
(#25499142)
> One of the ways we recognize the externalities of our automotive culture is by making jaywalking illegal.
You mean the law in one municipality that hasn't taken effect yet, and that took months of LEO-adjacent protests?
We're slowly getting better, to be sure. But I don't think anybody should be content with the rate of progress.
Re:Jaywalking decriminalization, 100 years after the auto in...
by sonotmyname on Monday December 21, 2020 @04:26PM
(#25499775)
I think you mis-read GPs post...
Re:Jaywalking decriminalization, 100 years after the auto in...
by woodruffw on Monday December 21, 2020 @04:48PM
(#25500016)
I'm the GP of this particular thread, so hopefully not :-)
Re:Jaywalking decriminalization, 100 years after the auto in...
by tsimionescu on Monday December 21, 2020 @05:02PM
(#25500153)
I think they were referring to nineplay's post, which was the GP of the post that replied to you. It gets pretty confusing, I guess pointers are hard even in natural language.
nineplay's post seemed to me to suggest that they believe that jaywalking being illegal is in itself a way to deal with the externalities of the car culture - it seems they are happy with jaywalking being illegal. I would guess that is why they also got the down votes.
Your reply seems to be written as if you thought nineplay was praising people making jaywalking not illegal, which I believe is the wrong reading of their post.
One of the ways we recognize the externalities of our automotive culture is by making jaywalking illegal.