Re:The Strange Case of Dr. Ho Man Kwok (2019)
by dragonwriter on Monday December 21, 2020 @03:24PM
(#25499149)
> they’ve redefined “racism” to mean “at a minimum, stereotyping another person from a position of power or authority”.
Nitpick: you left out “on the basis of race/ethnicity”.
But the bigger problem is that while that definition is somewhat controversial (and not at all recent), it was a narrowing of the pre-existing and generally accepted definition, which is identical but without the restriction “from a perception of power or authority”.
> The implications of that new definition are that many people who were previously guilty of stereotyping, are now racist.
No, the implication of the “new” (50 years old this year) definition is that members of disadvantaged racial minorities cannot, generally, be properly viewed as “racist”. It narrows, rather than expands, what is understood by “racism”.
The spectrum that the word "racist" covers is simply too large.
That's why I've pointed out that it used to just be called "stereotyping" but there's been a concerted effort on the part of those pushing identity politics, to make this about power. It's to the point where they've redefined "racism" to mean "at a minimum, stereotyping another person from a position of power or authority".
The implications of that new definition are that many people who were previously guilty of stereotyping, are now racist. In fact, basically any white person who stereotypes, because they generally have privileges' and power in society, are now "racist".
I don't agree with the redefinition, and I think it's an example of a pendulum that has swung too far.