Very few software engineer are working on something that 27m people want to experience per engineer on the project. Any engineer who can build something that 27m people want and get it to them can make far more than average.

There's no need to put her down simply because you don't agree with the content that she creates.

And she does create content; and as far as I'm concerned in the great divide between content creators and consumers being a creator is of much greater value in the world, no matter the type of creation (whether it's a silly youtube video, music, art, games or anything else really).

She is doing what she likes and making good money for it. She has a loyal audience which enjoys the content she creates. She is not actively harming anyone. So why talk so negatively about her?

Her twin is the one getting her real estate license. She is not trying to be a realtor.

You should take an Econ 101 class. It will help you understand the concept of people paying for/watching things they find valuable.

> someone this dumb who makes videos and hucks mid-level apts in Seattle as a noob "realtor"

Why the ad hominem?

Because young people look at this kind of content and spend their time trying to emulate it instead of truly improving themselves or taking on greater, more valuable challenges, that have greater rewards.

Emulation is powerful, especially when you're new.

You're right, but, by reproducing success it's guaranteed income. Copying a successful strategy / same as copying an algorithm.

None of what you stated justifies the need for ad hominem. So, again, why the ad hominem?

Someone sounds jealous.