News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:London put in emergency lockdown as U.K. fights new strain by spoonjim on Saturday December 19, 2020 @05:13PM (#25481751)
Staff enforcement is much easier in the US since losing your job results in homelessness.
Re:London put in emergency lockdown as U.K. fights new strain by tedivm on Saturday December 19, 2020 @05:55PM (#25482056)
The US has a homelessness rate of 6.2%, while the UK has a homelessness rate of 7.7%.
Re:London put in emergency lockdown as U.K. fights new strain by mjbeswick on Sunday December 20, 2020 @02:29AM (#25484598)
That's actually nonsense for the UK, as the real figure is 280,000 which includes people in temporary accommodation, which is provided by the government.

In the UK if someone is on the street and needs a place to stay there are shelters in every town. Nationally there are about 4,000 people that sleep rough, although most of the people that do suffer from addiction or mental illness. Many choose not to go to shelters because you have to be sober to stay in them.

Re:London put in emergency lockdown as U.K. fights new strain by pjc50 on Saturday December 19, 2020 @06:22PM (#25482258)
That is astonishingly high and may be counted differently (people living insecurely on couches)
Re:London put in emergency lockdown as U.K. fights new strain by hexedpackets on Saturday December 19, 2020 @06:35PM (#25482346)
Not sure about the UK, but any kind of insecure or temporary housing is counted for the US - including people living on couches.
Re:London put in emergency lockdown as U.K. fights new strain by rootusrootus on Saturday December 19, 2020 @11:45PM (#25483929)
Using what metric?

To use a local(ish) example to me, Multnomah County in Oregon has about 815K people, and 3800 that are either living on the streets, in a shelter, or in temporary housing. That's 0.4%. Portland is known for having a homeless problem.

Re:London put in emergency lockdown as U.K. fights new strain by OJFord on Saturday December 19, 2020 @08:50PM (#25483114)
One in around fourteen? I don't need to look anything up to know that's way off, in both countries. I doubt that can even count as 'misleading'.