Twitter cut off the ability to read a tweet by fetching its URL with a HTTP GET

Re:Twitter cut off the ability to read a tweet by fetching i... by betwixthewires on Friday December 18, 2020 @03:54AM (#25465169)

When it comes to publishing, it doesn't matter where you publish, only that you can put your words out there. If someone has a web browser they can read what you say. The only thing that suffers is engagement, which you'll have a hard time getting regardless what website you use to publish if you're just starting out. But engagement is either meaningful or noise, and meaningful engagement comes from thoughtful words, not the size of the website.

So don't worry about critical mass. Pick where you want to publish based on what is important to you.

I almost exclusively use FOSS, federated networks to publish my thoughts, the only exception being this site. I engage here pretty often because I like the quality of the discussion and the rule of only contributing if you have something constructive to contribute, but ideally this website wouldn't be a silo.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Twitter cut off the ability to read a tweet by fetching i... by CyberRabbi on Friday December 18, 2020 @04:04AM (#25465221)

I made no judgments on the value or importance of critical mass.

Critical mass seems important for exposure and personally I don’t think exposure is important unless you are seeking to maximize something that comes from exposure, usually it’s profit.

My comment was mainly to bring attention to what I consider the primary causal factor behind twitter’s critical mass.

[ Parent | on HN ]