News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Microsoft says it found malicious software in its systems by justapassenger on Thursday December 17, 2020 @08:57PM (#25462943)
That’s the strongest truthful statement any company can give you. You can never be 100% sure you aren’t hacked. You can only be sure, that as far as you know, no one hacked you.
Re:Microsoft says it found malicious software in its systems by kccqzy on Thursday December 17, 2020 @10:00PM (#25463323)
When Bloomberg implicated Apple in The Big Hack, Apple gave way stronger denials. So did Amazon.

> Apple has never found malicious chips, “hardware manipulations” or vulnerabilities purposely planted in any server. Apple never had any contact with the FBI or any other agency about such an incident. We are not aware of any investigation by the FBI, nor are our contacts in law enforcement.

Re:Microsoft says it found malicious software in its systems by justapassenger on Thursday December 17, 2020 @11:02PM (#25463697)
Exactly - Apple never said "we weren't hacked, 100% sure". They said, that all the data they have shows no evidence, plus pointed out some BS in the story.
Re:Microsoft says it found malicious software in its systems by Red_Leaves_Flyy on Friday December 18, 2020 @09:32AM (#25467421)
Interesting that they only mention server. What about their employee devices, networking hardware, and every other internet connected thing? Not saying I buy this theory, but that denial leaves a lot of technically correct room to lie through their teeth.
Re:Microsoft says it found malicious software in its systems by caminocorner on Friday December 18, 2020 @02:56PM (#25471186)
Thats because the entirety of Bloomberg's nonsense focused on a supposed server. So there wasn't any need to disown employee devices, mobile phones, iot, etc
Re:Microsoft says it found malicious software in its systems by dragonwriter on Friday December 18, 2020 @04:34AM (#25465405)
> That’s the strongest truthful statement any company can give you.

Oh, I agree that no company will ever make a categorical denial of something like this; I just don't think that justifies promoting a lesser denial into a categorical one.