News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:When free software isn't practically superior (2015) by hertzrat on Thursday December 17, 2020 @06:05PM (#25461694)
Another huge benefit is that the foss software won’t just disappear if the company has a bad quarter. If the maintainers or developers leave the project, in a pinch you can make a bug fix yourself or at least legally preserve a copy of it. It’s a major risk that an offering you depend on might change or disappear if it isn’t foss
Re:When free software isn't practically superior (2015) by aidenn0 on Thursday December 17, 2020 @06:08PM (#25461716)
Many companies will agree to escrow their code (at the customer's expense) against the risk of them going out of business. I've never actually seen it happen, but it definitely has been offered when that concern was raised, and once the customer has to pay for it, they immediately say not to bother.
Re:When free software isn't practically superior (2015) by hertzrat on Thursday December 17, 2020 @06:15PM (#25461781)
Imagine it’s a web or iOS or Android app. Imagine that you put 10,000 cards into supermemo.com and they took it down because of some legal dispute with another company. I have about 15k cards in anki for this reason: I’m not at a large risk of losing a significant investment if something randomly happens to the creator of the software
Re:When free software isn't practically superior (2015) by aidenn0 on Thursday December 17, 2020 @11:18PM (#25463814)
If it's not self hosted, it doesn't matter if you have the source or not
Re:When free software isn't practically superior (2015) by hertzrat on Friday December 18, 2020 @02:19AM (#25464643)
Good point. You could still import your backups into a replacement after somebody else resumes the project. Many apps don’t even offer backups or export. Supermemo.com incidentally did not at the time I moved away from it years ago