News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:No Cookie for You by Nextgrid on Thursday December 17, 2020 @01:12PM (#25458362)
The regulation explicitly forbids annoying banners, the problem is that there’s currently zero enforcement of it so websites continue breaching it and lying to themselves (and others) by thinking their consent banners are compliant.
Re:No Cookie for You by IMTDb on Thursday December 17, 2020 @01:56PM (#25458904)
>The regulation explicitly forbids annoying banners

You have to love how the regulator did not even try to define what they mean by "annoying". Thus making the whole law completely useless.

In my book, any single pixel of my limited screen real estate that gets dedicated to this useless regulation is annoying. If the EU wants to enforce this, they need to provide a way for me to basically say "Yes, I agree with all tracking cookies for all sites forever", and never see a banner again.

Re:No Cookie for You by baxtr on Thursday December 17, 2020 @01:43PM (#25458752)
But that’s exactly my point. Why regulate if things get worse. If you regulate think about enforcing beforehand. What’s the use?
Re:No Cookie for You by eitland on Friday December 18, 2020 @12:49AM (#25464278)
Enforcement is already happening. Multiple confirmed cases of fines being handed out to businesses, organisations etc :-)

More importantly IMO they are also contacting entities up front to tell them about violations and how to get compliant, the fines we have seen yet seems (again IMO) to be only for particularly nasty cases and/or cases where the entities in question refuses to change.

This means the fines we are seeing is just the top of the iceberg: most changes happens underneath the surface and only trickles up in the form of less annoying websites (or fines) little by little.