News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Trump Is Considering Clemency for Silk Road Founder by crx07 on Thursday December 17, 2020 @12:02AM (#25452684)
He literally has no ideology or apparent political convictions of any kind. His position on any given issue can change 3 times in the same day and his disposition has no other pattern besides consistent inconsistency.
Re:Trump Is Considering Clemency for Silk Road Founder by RhysU on Thursday December 17, 2020 @12:11AM (#25452736)
Go read Barr's resignation letter. Trump is a high variance process that needs to be smoothed to understand him. Recall that Barr did not need to make a name for himself. Nor does Barr ever need another job.
Re:Trump Is Considering Clemency for Silk Road Founder by scrollbar on Thursday December 17, 2020 @12:51AM (#25452971)
I'm very curious- I went looking and didn't see what you're hinting at.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/14/politics/ag-barr-resignation-...

What am I looking for exactly?

Re:Trump Is Considering Clemency for Silk Road Founder by RhysU on Thursday December 17, 2020 @06:55AM (#25454750)
Paragraphs 3 and 4 call out difficult, extended actions by the administration from which one can infer both ideology and political convictions.
Re:Trump Is Considering Clemency for Silk Road Founder by throwaway201103 on Thursday December 17, 2020 @12:11AM (#25452734)
So strong opinions, weakly held? I've seen that way of thinking praised here on HN many times.
Re:Trump Is Considering Clemency for Silk Road Founder by maxerickson on Thursday December 17, 2020 @12:15AM (#25452756)
No, fleeting thoughts, barely there.

Or if you want to be more charitable, whatever opinion is most useful for the immediate moment. But I think that's an overestimation, lots of them aren't that coherent.

Re:Trump Is Considering Clemency for Silk Road Founder by crx07 on Sunday December 20, 2020 @04:55PM (#25489892)
It's some combination of those things. Lots of them are just random filler and arbitrary ramblings, but the ones he gets pressed on repeatedly are answered in whatever way provokes a desired reaction at that exact moment. Some of it even seems to be remorseless and haphazard A/B testing. He's well beyond a severe pathological liar, as most such people would lack an innate desire to deceive with such intense frequency, and there might not even be a name yet for whatever trait he exhibits. Psychologists are just forbidden by their licensing body from commenting on a president's mental state while still in office.