Re:Estimated 1.56B face masks will have entered oceans in 2020
by slaw on Tuesday December 15, 2020 @03:51PM
(#25435084)
There will be some mortality excess in 2020.
'The observed temporary excess mortality likely arises because people in vulnerable groups die weeks or months earlier than they would otherwise, due to the timing and severity of the unusual external event.' https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.11.11.20229708v...
Re:Estimated 1.56B face masks will have entered oceans in 2020
by yibg on Tuesday December 15, 2020 @04:16PM
(#25435367)
I’m all for data driven decisions. We just need to be more careful to dig into the details of the data. A simple excess mortality figure may not be relevant. Both covid and the lockdowns could have caused increased or decreased mortalities in other areas.
Eg if there was zero excess mortality, that alone doesn’t prove much either way.
Re:Estimated 1.56B face masks will have entered oceans in 2020
by worker767424 on Wednesday December 16, 2020 @02:30AM
(#25439996)
I wonder if we would have noticed this before modern hospitals and record keeping. I suspect it would have spread much slower, maybe over a decade. In a village of 1,000, there might be 5 deaths that would have been written off as a bad flu, or whatever people used to call getting sick like that.
Here's a nice graph of deaths per month per millon for a nearly 200 year perspective: https://swprs.org/facts-about-covid-19/#foobox-1/3/sweden-mo...